10-Year Follow-Up of Patients With Everolimus-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Salvatore Brugaletta*, Josep Gomez-Lara, Luis Ortega-Paz, Victor Jimenez-Diaz, Marcelo Jimenez, Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo, Roberto Diletti, Vicente Mainar, Gianluca Campo, Antonio Silvestro, Jaume Maristany, Xacobe Flores, Loreto Oyarzabal, Antonio De Miguel-Castro, Andrés Iñiguez, Antonio Serra, Luis Nombela-Franco, Alfonso Ielasi, Maurizio Tespili, Mattie LenzenNieves Gonzalo, Pascual Bordes, Matteo Tebaldi, Simone Biscaglia, Juan Jose Rodriguez-Arias, Soheil Al-Shaibani, Victor Arevalos, Rafael Romaguera, Joan Antoni Gomez-Hospital, Patrick W. Serruys, Manel Sabaté

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)
16 Downloads (Pure)


Background: Outcomes data for a durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent (EES) at extended long-term follow-up in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are unknown. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the 10-year outcomes of patients enrolled in the EXAMINATION (A Clinical Evaluation of Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stents in the Treatment of Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trial. Methods: The EXAMINATION-EXTEND (10-Years Follow-Up of the EXAMINATION Trial) study is an investigator-driven 10-year follow-up of the EXAMINATION trial, which randomly assigned 1,498 patients with STEMI in a 1:1 ratio to receive either EES (n = 751) or bare-metal stents (n = 747). The primary endpoint was a patient-oriented composite endpoint of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization. Secondary endpoints included a device-oriented composite endpoint of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization; the individual components of the combined endpoints; and stent thrombosis. Results: Complete 10-year clinical follow-up was obtained in 94.5% of the EES group and 95.9% of the bare-metal stent group. Rates of the patient-oriented composite endpoint and device-oriented composite endpoint were significantly reduced in the EES group (32.4% vs. 38.0% [hazard ratio: 0.81; 95% confidence interval: 0.68 to 0.96; p = 0.013] and 13.6% vs. 18.4% [hazard ratio: 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.55 to 0.93; p = 0.012], respectively), driven mainly by target lesion revascularization (5.7% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.018). The rate of definite stent thrombosis was similar in both groups (2.2% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.590). No differences were found between the groups in terms of target lesion revascularization (1.4% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.963) and definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.6% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.703) between 5 and 10 years. Conclusions: At 10-year follow-up, EES demonstrated confirmed superiority in combined patient- and device-oriented composite endpoints compared with bare-metal stents in patients with STEMI requiring primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Between 5- and 10-year follow-up, a low incidence of adverse cardiovascular events related to device failure was found in both groups. (10-Years Follow-Up of the EXAMINATION Trial; NCT04462315)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1165-1178
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 9 Mar 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The EXAMINATION trial was partially funded by an unrestricted grant from Abbott Vascular to the Spanish Heart Foundation (promoter) during the first 5 years of follow-up. The EXAMINATION-EXTEND study was funded by an unrestricted grant from Abbott Vascular to the Spanish Heart Foundation (promoter). Dr. Brugaletta is a consultant for Boston Scientific and iVascular. Dr. Sabaté has receiving consulting and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and iVascular. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Publisher Copyright: © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation


Dive into the research topics of '10-Year Follow-Up of Patients With Everolimus-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this