Abstract
A prospective randomised phase III study in patients ≤65 years old with previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM), intensive chemotherapy followed by myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell rescue was compared with intensive chemotherapy alone. This economic evaluation was based on detailed data from patient charts and hospital information systems. In the intention-to-treat analysis, mean total treatment and follow-up costs of the myeloablative treatment arm were €81,643 compared to €68,802 for the chemotherapy arm (P=0.09). Costs per quality-adjusted life year were €51,357 versus €37,328. In the clinical study, no significant differences were found in overall survival after a median follow-up of 33 months from randomisation. Intensive chemotherapy is regarded as standard therapy for younger patients with previously untreated MM. Cost-effectiveness of myeloma therapy after 3 years of follow up seems not to be favoured by myeloablative treatment with autologous stem-cell rescue.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1159-1169 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | European Journal of Cancer |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| Early online date | 16 Mar 2004 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2004 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information: Supported by the National Health Council of The Netherlands.© 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A cost-utility analysis comparing intensive chemotherapy alone to intensive chemotherapy followed by myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell rescue in newly diagnosed patients with stage II/III multiple myeloma: A prospective randomised phase III study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver