A critical appraisal of perioperative sleep apnoea management after nasal surgery: A review of up-to-date literature supplemented by findings of a retrospective observational study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

70 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: To review the current recommendations on postoperative precautions for obstructive sleep apnoea patients undergoing elective nasal surgery. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Anesthesiology/Intensive Care, University Teaching Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Participants: The medical charts of 61 patients with sleep apnoea who were admitted to the post-anaesthesia care unit between 2016 and 2020, following nasal surgery were reviewed. Main outcome measures: Number of respiratory events during post-anaesthesia care unit admission that required medical intervention. Results: In all 61 patients, continuous positive airway pressure could not be used. In 13 patients (8%), decreased oxygen saturation levels were registered during the first postoperative night, and in five of these patients, supplemental oxygen was needed. No other respiratory incidents of medical interventions were registered. Conclusions: The number of clinically relevant respiratory events of obstructive sleep apnoea patients with bilateral nasal packing following nasal surgery is low. We suggest that the safety of less expensive and less scarce alternatives of postoperative observation should be explored.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)96-101
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of perioperative practice
Volume35
Issue number4
Early online date11 Jan 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A critical appraisal of perioperative sleep apnoea management after nasal surgery: A review of up-to-date literature supplemented by findings of a retrospective observational study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this