A critical review of the conceptualization, operationalization, and empirical literature on cognition-based and affect-based trust

Alison Legood, Lisa Vanderwerff, Allan Lee, DN (Deanne) den Hartog, Daan van Knippenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Trust plays a pivotal role in the development and maintenance of effective working relationships. In this paper we offer a critical review of the conceptualization and operationalization of cognition-based and affect-based trust. While definitions and measures of trust are abundant, the view of trust as a concept with cognitive and affective bases is well established. Nevertheless, the validity of this approach has rarely been examined. Our theoretical and empirical review (content validity study, systematic review and meta-analysis) of the literature reveals a failure to fully capture cognition or affect in current trust theory and measurement. We find the construct of affect-based trust to be particularly problematic in its current form. Resolving these issues is critical to advancing our understanding of the differentiating roles of these two important bases of trust. We detail areas for future research on the conceptualization and measurement of trust to stimulate theoretical exploration and methodological advances.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)495-537
Number of pages43
JournalJournal of Management Studies
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Management Studies published by Society for the Advancement of Management Studies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Research programs

  • RSM ORG

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A critical review of the conceptualization, operationalization, and empirical literature on cognition-based and affect-based trust'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this