A mixed methods evaluation of Girls' Talk+: A sexuality education programme for girls with mild intellectual disabilities

Suzanne J. van den Toren, Stans de Haas, Eline Dalmijn, Hans Feenstra, Willy van Berlo*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Girls with a mild intellectual disability generally receive less sexuality education than their non-disabled peers, while their needs for sexual knowledge are possibly greater. This study aimed to evaluate the effect and process of a new sexuality education programme (Girls' Talk+), focused on sexual health among girls with a mild intellectual disability in the Netherlands. Methods: A mixed methods approach was applied, using participant questionnaires (n = 249), logs written by trainers (n = 17) and interviews with trainers (n = 10). Descriptive statistics and linear regression models were used to analyse the quantitative data. Several coding phases were used to analyse the interviews. Results and conclusions: This study provides some indication that Girls' Talk+ has positive results on improving knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy in relation to sexual health as well as trainer and participant satisfaction with the programme.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1009-1018
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A mixed methods evaluation of Girls' Talk+: A sexuality education programme for girls with mild intellectual disabilities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this