Abstract
Background: In poor settings, where many births and neonatal deaths occur at home, prediction models of neonatal mortality in the general population can aid public-health policy-making. No such models are available in the international literature. We developed and validated a prediction model for neonatal mortality in the general population in India, Nepal and Bangladesh.Methods: Using data (49632 live births, 1742 neonatal deaths) from rural and urban surveillance sites in South Asia, we developed regression models to predict the risk of neonatal death with characteristics known at (i) the start of pregnancy, (ii) start of delivery and (iii) 5 minutes post partum. We assessed the models' discriminative ability by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), using cross-validation between sites.Results: At the start of pregnancy, predictive ability was moderate {AUC 0.59 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-0.61]} and predictors of neonatal death were low maternal education and economic status, short birth interval, primigravida, and young and advanced maternal age. At the start of delivery, predictive ability was considerably better [AUC 0.73 (95% CI 0.70-0.76)] and prematurity and multiple pregnancy were strong predictors of death. At 5 minutes post partum, predictive ability was good [AUC: 0.85 (95% CI 0.80-0.89)]; very strong predictors were multiple birth, prematurity and a poor condition of the infant at 5 minutes.Conclusions: We developed good performing prediction models for neonatal mortality. Neonatal deaths are highly concentrated in a small group of high-risk infants, even in poor settings in South Asia. Risk assessment, as supported by our models, can be used as a basis for improving community- and facility-based newborn care and prevention strategies in poor settings.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 186-198 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | International Journal of Epidemiology |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Funding:This work was supported by the Economic and Social
Research Council and the Department for International
Development (grant number ES/I033572/1) and a Wellcome
Trust Strategic Award (award number: 085417MA/Z/08/
Z). T.A.J.H. was supported by an Erasmus University
Rotterdam Research Excellence Initiative grant. D.v.K. was
supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific
Research (grant number 917.11.383). J.V.B. was supported
by fellowship grants from the Netherlands Lung Foundation
and the Erasmus University Medical Center. The funders
had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. T.A.J.H.
and D.v.K. had full access to all the data in the study and
take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Research programs
- EMC MM-03-54-04-A
- EMC NIHES-02-65-02