A Proteome Comparison Between Physiological Angiogenesis and Angiogenesis in Glioblastoma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The molecular pathways involved in neovascularization of regenerating tissues and tumor angiogenesis resemble each other. However, the regulatory mechanisms of neovascularization under neoplastic circumstances are unbalanced leading to abnormal protein expression patterns resulting in the formation of defective and often abortive tumor vessels. Because gliomas are among the most vascularized tumors, we compared the protein expression profiles of proliferating vessels in glioblastoma with those in tissues in which physiological angiogenesis takes place. By using a combination of laser microdissection and LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometry comparisons of protein profiles were made. The approach yielded 29 and 12 differentially expressed proteins for glioblastoma and endometrium blood vessels, respectively. The aberrant expression of five proteins, i.e. periostin, tenascin-C, TGFbeta induced protein, integrin alpha-V, and laminin subunit beta-2 were validated by immunohistochemistry. In addition, pathway analysis of the differentially expressed proteins was performed and significant differences in the usage of angiogenic pathways were found. We conclude that there are essential differences in protein expression profiles between tumor and normal physiological angiogenesis. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 11: 10.1074/mcp.M111.008466, 1-9, 2012.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
JournalMolecular & Cellular Proteomics
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this