A quantitative measurement of regret theory

Han Bleichrodt, A Cillo, E Diecidue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper introduces a method to measure regret theory, a popular theory of decision under uncertainty. Regret theory allows for violations of transitivity, and it may seem paradoxical to quantitatively measure an intransitive theory. We adopt the trade-off method and show that it is robust to violations of transitivity. Our method makes no assumptions about the shape of the functions reflecting utility and regret. It can be performed at the individual level, taking account of preference heterogeneity. Our data support the main assumption of regret theory, that people are disproportionately averse to large regrets, even when event-splitting effects are controlled for. The findings are robust: similar results were obtained in two measurements using different stimuli. The data support the reliability of the trade-off method: its measurements could be replicated using different stimuli and were not susceptible to strategic responding.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-175
Number of pages15
JournalManagement Science
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A quantitative measurement of regret theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this