A randomised comparison of bilateral recession versus unilateral recession-resection as surgery for infantile esotropia

Jan Roelof Polling, Rene Eijkemans, J van Esser, U Gilles, GH Kolling, E Schulz, B Lorenz, P Roggenkamper, V Herzau, A Zubcov, MPM ten Tusscher, D Wittebol-Post, GC Gusek-Schneider, JRM Cruysberg, Huib Simonsz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Infantile esotropia, a common form of strabismus, is treated either by bilateral recession (BR) or by unilateral recession-resection (RR). Differences in degree of alignment achieved by these two procedures have not previously been examined in a randomised controlled trial. Design: Controlled, randomised multicentre trial. Setting: 12 university clinics. Participants and intervention: 124 patients were randomly assigned to either BR or RR. Standardised protocol prescribed that the total relocation of the muscles, in millimetres, was calculated by dividing the preoperative latent angle of strabismus at distance, in degrees, by 1.6. Main outcome measure: Alignment assessed as the variation of the postoperative angle of strabismus during alternating cover. Results: The mean preoperative latent angle of strabismus at distance fixation was +17.2 degrees (SD 4.4) for BR and +17.5 degrees (4.0) for RR. The mean postoperative angle of strabismus at distance was +2.3 degrees (5.1) for BR and +2.9 degrees (3.5) for RR (p = 0.46 for reduction in the angle and p = 0.22 for the within-group variation). The mean reduction in the angle of strabismus was 1.41 degrees (0.45) per millimetre of muscle relocation for RR and 1.47 (0.50) for BR (p = 0.50 for reduction in the angle). Alignment was associated with postoperative binocular vision (p = 0.001) in both groups. Conclusions: No statistically significant difference was found between BR and RR as surgery for infantile esotropia.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)954-957
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume93
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Research programs

  • EMC NIHES-02-65-01
  • EMC OR-01-60-01

Cite this