A Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes and Measures of Overall Health in Adults

Jaheeda Gangannagaripalli, Andrea Albagli, Stacie N. Myers, Sarah Whittaker, Andria Joseph, Anna Clarke, Lucy Matkin, Jordi Alonso, Ira Byock, Michael van den Berg, Carolyn Canfield, John Chaplin, Juan Dapueto, Marcelo Pio de Almedia Fleck, Chris Sidey-Gibbons, Jan Hazelzet, Rachel Hess, Kaisa Immonen, Serena Joyner, Catherine KatzCarolyn Kerrigan, Cindy Lam, Joanne Lunn, Fiona McKenzie, Alastair Roeves, Caleb Stowell, Timothy Switaj, Melissa Tinsley, Eyal Zimlichman, Jose M. Valderas*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
17 Downloads (Pure)


Background: The definition of population-specific outcomes is an essential precondition for the implementation of value-based health care. We developed a minimum standard outcome set for overall adult health (OAH) to facilitate the implementation of value-based health care in tracking, comparing, and improving overall health care outcomes of adults across multiple conditions, which would be of particular relevance for primary care and public health populations. Methods: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) convened an international panel (patients, clinicians, and topic experts). Following the development of a conceptual framework, a modified Delphi method (supported by public consultations) was implemented to identify, in sequence, the relevant domains, the best instruments for measuring them, the timing of measurement, and the relevant adjustment variables. Findings: Outcomes were identified in relation to overall health status and the domains of physical, mental, and social health. Three instruments covering these domains were identified: PROMIS Scale v1.2—Global Health (10 items), WHO Wellbeing Index (5 items), and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (12 items). Case-mix variables included a range of sociodemographic and biometric measures. Yearly measurement was proposed for all outcomes and most case-mix variables. Interpretation: The ICHOM OAH Standard Set has been developed through consensus-based methods based on predefined criteria following high standards for the identification and selection of high-quality measures The involvements of a wide range of stakeholders supports the acceptability of the set, which is readily available for use and feasibility testing in clinical settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341-351
Number of pages11
Issue number3
Early online date1 Nov 2021
Publication statusPublished - May 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors thank all patients and professionals participating in the patient surveys. The International Society for Quality-of-Life Research provided support as part of a collaboration with ICHOM for supporting best methods in the identification, selection, and implementation of patient-reported outcomes. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy or position of Brooke Army Medical Center, the US Army Medical Department, the US Army Office of the Surgeon General, the Department of the Army, the Department of the Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the US Government.

Funding Information:
This work was supported through sponsorship from the NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation, NHS Wales HCF Research Foundation, and Providence Health Care.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).


Dive into the research topics of 'A Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes and Measures of Overall Health in Adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this