ABSORB II randomized controlled trial. A clinical evaluation to compare the safety, efficacy, and performance of the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold system against the XIENCE everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of subjects with ischemic heart disease caused by de novo native coronary artery lesions: Rationale and study design

Roberto Diletti, PWJC (Patrick) Serruys, V Farooq, K Sudhir, C Dorange, K Miquel-Hebert, S Veldhof, R Rapoza, Yoshinobu Onuma, Hector Garcia Garcia, B Chevalier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

121 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Currently, no data are available on the direct comparison between the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS) and conventional metallic drug-eluting stents. Methods The ABSORB II study is a randomized, active-controlled, single-blinded, multicenter clinical trial aiming to compare the second-generation Absorb BVS with the XIENCE everolimus-eluting metallic stent. Approximately 501 subjects will be enrolled on a 2:1 randomization basis (Absorb BVS/XIENCE stent) in approximately 40 investigational sites across Europe and New Zealand. Treated lesions will be up to 2 de novo native coronary artery lesions, each located in different major epicardial vess Conclusions The ABSORB II randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01425281) is designed to compare the safety, efficacy, and performance of Absorb BVS against the XIENCE everolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of de novo native coronary artery lesions. (Am Heart J 2012;164:654-63.)
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)654-663
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
Volume164
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Research programs

  • EMC COEUR-09

Cite this