Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Adalimumab combined with methotrexate versus adalimumab monotherapy in psoriasis: Three-year follow-up data of a single-blind randomized controlled trial

  • Astrid M. van Huizen*
  • , Gayle E. van der Kraaij
  • , Celine I. Busard
  • , Wouter Ouwerkerk
  • , Juul M.P.A. van den Reek
  • , Stef P. Menting
  • , Errol P. Prens
  • , Theo Rispens
  • , Annick de Vries
  • , Elke M.G.J. de Jong
  • , Jo Lambert
  • , Martijn B.A. van Doorn
  • , Phyllis I. Spuls
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • National Heart Centre Singapore
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • Sanquin Blood Supply Foundation
  • Ghent University Hospital
  • Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
  • Center for Human Drug Research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
202 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) are formed in patients treated with adalimumab (ADL). This might increase clearance of ADL, potentially causing a (secondary) non-response. Combination therapy of ADL and methotrexate (MTX) reduces ADA levels and has a clinical benefit in rheumatologic diseases. In psoriasis however, the long-term effectiveness and safety have not been studied. Objectives: To investigate the three-year follow-up data of ADL combined with MTX compared to ADL monotherapy in ADL-naive patients with moderate to severe plaque type psoriasis. Methods: We conducted a multicentre RCT in the Netherlands and Belgium. Randomization was performed by a centralized online randomization service. Patients were seen every 12 weeks until week 145. Outcome assessors were blinded. We collected data on drug survival, effectiveness, safety, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of patients that started ADL combined with MTX compared to ADL monotherapy. We present descriptive analysis and patients were analysed according to the group initially randomized to. Patients becoming non-adherent to the biologic were excluded from analyses. Results: Sixty-one patients were included and 37 patients (ADL group n = 17, ADL + MTX group n = 20) continued in the follow-up study after 1 year. After 109 weeks and 145 weeks, there was a trend towards longer drug survival in the ADL + MTX group compared to the ADL group (week 109: 54.8% vs. 41.4%; p = 0.326, week 145: 51.6% vs. 41.4%; p = 0.464). At week 145, 7/13 patients were treated with MTX. In the ADL group, 4/12 patients that completed the study developed ADA, and 3/13 in the ADL + MTX group. Conclusions: In this small study, there was no significant difference in ADL overall drug survival when it was initially combined with MTX, compared to ADL alone. Discontinuation due to adverse events was common in the combination group. To secure accessible healthcare, combination treatment of ADL and MTX can be considered in individual patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1815-1824
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Volume37
Issue number9
Early online date4 Apr 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank S. Atalay, M. van Burken, N. Maes, R. Soenen, L. Prens, M. Tjong Joe Wai, F.M. Vermeulen, L. van Vugt for support in data collection, G.A. Appel, M. Kooijman-Otero, N. Pouw, H.M. van der Stok for monitoring this study and B. van Montfrans, S.W. Tas, A.H. Zwinderman for participating in data safety monitoring board.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adalimumab combined with methotrexate versus adalimumab monotherapy in psoriasis: Three-year follow-up data of a single-blind randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this