Additional value of prenatal genomic array testing in fetuses with isolated structural ultrasound abnormalities and a normal karyotype: a systematic review of the literature

Charlotte Wit, Gosia Srebniak, LCP Govaerts, D Opstal, Robert-Jan Galjaard, Attie Go

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

135 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To establish the prevalence of submicroscopic genetic copy number variants (CNVs) in fetuses with a structural ultrasound anomaly (restricted to one anatomical system) and a normal karyotype. The aim was to determine the diagnostic and prognostic value of genomic array testing in these pregnancies. Methods Embase and PubMed databases were systematically searched for all relevant articles on prevalence of pathogenic submicroscopic CNVs in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies. Reported cases were sorted into groups according to anatomical site of the detected ultrasound anomaly. The prevalence of causative submicroscopic CNVs was calculated for each group. Results Combined data of the reviewed studies (n=18) indicated that fetuses with an ultrasound anomaly restricted to one anatomical system (n=2220) had a 3.1-7.9% chance of carrying a causative submicroscopic CNV, depending on the anatomical system affected. This chance increased to 9.1% for fetuses with multiple ultrasound anomalies (n=1139). Conclusion This review indicates that 3.1-7.9% of fetuses with a structural ultrasound anomaly restricted to one anatomical system and a normal karyotype will show a submicroscopic CNV, which explains its phenotype and provides information for fetal prognosis. Therefore, we conclude that microarray has considerable diagnostic and prognostic value in these pregnancies. Copyright (C) 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)139-146
Number of pages8
JournalUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Research programs

  • EMC MGC-02-52-01-A
  • EMC MGC-02-96-01

Cite this