Addressing the spiritual domain in a plural society: What is the best mode of integrating spiritual care into healthcare?

A.I. Liefbroer*, R.R. Ganzevoort, E. Olsman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)
19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study aims to rethink the integration of spiritual care into healthcare in spiritually plural societies. Based on a systematic review of the theoretical literature, we analysed 74 studies and distinguish four positions regarding the integration of spiritual care into healthcare: generalist-particularists who see the spiritual domain as a field to be addressed by all professional caregivers and in which caregivers’ own spiritual orientations play a vital role; generalist-universalists who advocate for all caregivers to provide spiritual care regardless of their spiritual orientations; specialist-particularists who argue that experts should address the spiritual domain in light of their own spiritual orientations; and specialist-universalists who call for experts to provide spiritual care regardless of their spiritual orientations. We argue that these four positions give different weight to the professional, personal, and confessional roles of the spiritual caregiver. Acknowledging these positions is a prerequisite for future scenarios of integrating spiritual care into healthcare.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)244-260
Number of pages17
JournalMental Health, Religion and Culture
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Jun 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Addressing the spiritual domain in a plural society: What is the best mode of integrating spiritual care into healthcare?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this