Adherence to Guidelines in Adult Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Living Systematic Review

Maryse C. Cnossen*, Annemieke C. Scholten, Hester F. Lingsma, Anneliese Synnot, Emma Tavender, Dashiell Gantner, Fiona Lecky, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Suzanne Polinder

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Guidelines aim to improve the quality of medical care and reduce treatment variation. The extent to which guidelines are adhered to in the field of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is unknown. The objectives of this systematic review were to (1) quantify adherence to guidelines in adult patients with TBI, (2) examine factors influencing adherence, and (3) study associations of adherence to clinical guidelines and outcome. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and grey literature in October 2014. We included studies of evidence-based (inter)national guidelines that examined the acute treatment of adult patients with TBI. Methodological quality was assessed using the Research Triangle Institute item bank and Quality in Prognostic Studies Risk of Bias Assessment Instrument. Twenty-two retrospective and prospective observational cohort studies, reported in 25 publications, were included, describing adherence to 13 guideline recommendations. Guideline adherence varied considerably between studies (range 18-100%) and was higher in guideline recommendations based on strong evidence compared with those based on lower evidence, and lower in recommendations of relatively more invasive procedures such as craniotomy. A number of patient-related factors, including age, Glasgow Coma Scale, and intracranial pathology, were associated with greater guideline adherence. Guideline adherence to Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines seemed to be associated with lower mortality. Guideline adherence in TBI is suboptimal, and wide variation exists between studies. Guideline adherence may be improved through the development of strong evidence for guidelines. Further research specifying hospital and management characteristics that explain variation in guideline adherence is warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1072-1085
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Neurotrauma
Volume38
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Maryse C. Cnossen et al. 2016; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2016.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adherence to Guidelines in Adult Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Living Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this