TY - JOUR
T1 - Agreement on fixation of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures
AU - Spierenburg, Willemijn
AU - Dekker, Anne Britt E.
AU - Doornberg, Job N.
AU - Krijnen, Pieta
AU - van den Bekerom, Michel P.J.
AU - Schipper, Inger B.
AU - On behalf of the SOVG group
AU - Van Dulken, Eric
AU - Van Dijkman, Bart
AU - Kootstra, Jan
AU - Schep, Niels
AU - Kloen, Peter
AU - Zwaving, Hans
AU - Pranger, Marcel
AU - Meylaerts, Sven
AU - Krug, Egbert
AU - van Luijt, Peter
AU - Sintenie, Jan Bernard
AU - van Deurzen, Derk
AU - Alta, Tjarco
AU - Heijnen, Luc
AU - van Hove, Diederick
AU - van der Zwaal, Peer
AU - Dorrestijn, Oscar
AU - Campo, Martin
AU - Lansdaal, Joris
AU - Janus, Guus
AU - Raven, Eric
AU - van Doorn, Ruth
AU - Burgers, Anton
AU - Vochteloo, Anne
AU - Eygendaal, Denise
AU - Tanka, Andras
AU - Goslings, Carel
AU - Verhofstad, Michel
AU - van der Veen, Alexander
AU - Breederveld, Roelf
AU - el Moumni, Mostafa
AU - Beeres, Frank
AU - Greeven, Alexander
AU - van Helden, Sven
AU - Harbers, Jorrit
AU - Bartlema, Kees A.
AU - van der Vlies, Kees
AU - Zuidema, Wietse
AU - van de Sande, Michiel
AU - Termaat, Frank
AU - van der Wal, Robert
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Background: Pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures (pSCHFs) may be challenging injuries to treat because of the potential residual deformity. There is debate regarding the technical aspects of adequate closed reduction and crossed Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation. Purpose: Do surgeons have an agreement on the aspects of the fixation of pSCHFs? Methods: Radiographs of 20 patients from a cohort of 154 patients with pSCHFs treated with closed reduction and crossed K-wire fixation were selected. Forty-four surgeons viewed the postoperative radiographs and diagnosed the presence or absence of technical flaws and made a recommendation for or against reoperation. An expert panel of three orthopedic and trauma surgeons provided a reference standard for technical factors. Furthermore, final outcome 2 years after trauma was assessed. Results: There was limited agreement on potential technical flaws (ICC 0.15–0.28), radiographic measures of alignment (ICC for anterior humeral line and Baumann angle of 0.37 and 0.23 respectively), the quality of postoperative reduction, position of the elbow in cast, and recommendation for repeat surgery (ICCs between 0.23 and 0.40). Sensitivity and specificity for these questions ranged from 0.59 to 0.90. There was no correlation between the voted quality of postoperative reduction and loss of reduction or final function. Conclusions: Surgeons have limited agreement on the quality of postoperative results in pSCHFs and the indication for reoperation. Reviewing postoperative radiographs may present a good learning opportunity and could help improve skills, but it is not a validated method for quality control and has to be seen in light of clinical outcome.
AB - Background: Pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures (pSCHFs) may be challenging injuries to treat because of the potential residual deformity. There is debate regarding the technical aspects of adequate closed reduction and crossed Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation. Purpose: Do surgeons have an agreement on the aspects of the fixation of pSCHFs? Methods: Radiographs of 20 patients from a cohort of 154 patients with pSCHFs treated with closed reduction and crossed K-wire fixation were selected. Forty-four surgeons viewed the postoperative radiographs and diagnosed the presence or absence of technical flaws and made a recommendation for or against reoperation. An expert panel of three orthopedic and trauma surgeons provided a reference standard for technical factors. Furthermore, final outcome 2 years after trauma was assessed. Results: There was limited agreement on potential technical flaws (ICC 0.15–0.28), radiographic measures of alignment (ICC for anterior humeral line and Baumann angle of 0.37 and 0.23 respectively), the quality of postoperative reduction, position of the elbow in cast, and recommendation for repeat surgery (ICCs between 0.23 and 0.40). Sensitivity and specificity for these questions ranged from 0.59 to 0.90. There was no correlation between the voted quality of postoperative reduction and loss of reduction or final function. Conclusions: Surgeons have limited agreement on the quality of postoperative results in pSCHFs and the indication for reoperation. Reviewing postoperative radiographs may present a good learning opportunity and could help improve skills, but it is not a validated method for quality control and has to be seen in light of clinical outcome.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128253773&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00068-022-01970-7
DO - 10.1007/s00068-022-01970-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 35429249
AN - SCOPUS:85128253773
VL - 48
SP - 4277
EP - 4282
JO - European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
JF - European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
SN - 1863-9933
IS - 5
ER -