Ambiguity preferences for health

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)
10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In most medical decisions, probabilities are ambiguous and not objectively known. Empirical evidence suggests that people's preferences are affected by ambiguity. Health economic analyses generally ignore ambiguity preferences and assume that they are the same as preferences under risk. We show how health preferences can be measured under ambiguity, and we compare them with health preferences under risk. We assume a general ambiguity model that includes many of the ambiguity models that have been proposed in the literature. For health gains, ambiguity preferences and risk preferences were indeed the same. For health losses, they differed with subjects being more pessimistic in decision under ambiguity. Utility and loss aversion were the same for risk and ambiguity. Our results imply that reducing the clinical ambiguity of health losses has more impact than reducing the ambiguity of health gains, that utilities elicited with known probabilities may not carry over to an ambiguous setting, and that ambiguity aversion may impact value of information analyses if losses are involved. These findings are highly relevant for medical decision making, because most medical interventions involve losses.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1699-1716
Number of pages18
JournalHealth Economics
Volume27
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2018

Research programs

  • EMC NIHES-05-63-02 Quality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ambiguity preferences for health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this