Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An early economic evaluation of active surveillance for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ

  • Danalyn Byng
  • , Michael Schaapveld
  • , Esther H. Lips
  • , Frederieke H. van Duijnhoven
  • , Jelle Wesseling
  • , Wim H. van Harten
  • , Valesca P. Retèl*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Leiden University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
48 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aim: Perform early economic evaluation comparing active surveillance (AS) to surgery for women with low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ, a precursor of invasive breast cancer. Materials & methods: A 10-year incremental costs (€) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were compared between a simulated cohort of women undergoing breast conserving surgery ± radiotherapy, and a cohort with a low-risk subgroup undergoing AS using a semi-Markov model. Scenario and headroom analyses evaluated a better-performing biomarker to select low-risk women for AS. Results: AS resulted in lower costs and survival, but higher QALYs (±0.40). Scenario analyses maintained survival outcomes and maximized QALYs. Conclusion: AS for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ is cost-effective, but a better-performing biomarker to select low-risk women can maximize quality-adjusted outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3451-3462
Number of pages12
JournalFuture Oncology
Volume20
Issue number40
Early online date16 Dec 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An early economic evaluation of active surveillance for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this