TY - JOUR
T1 - An eHealth intervention for patients with a low socioeconomic position during their waiting period preceding cardiac rehabilitation
T2 - a randomized feasibility study
AU - Faber, Jasper S.
AU - Kraal, Jos J.
AU - ter Hoeve, Nienke
AU - Al-Dhahir, Isra
AU - Breeman, Linda D.
AU - Chavannes, Niels H.
AU - Evers, Andrea W. M.
AU - Bussmann, Hans B. J.
AU - Visch, Valentijn T.
AU - van den Berg-emons, Rita J. G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s).
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - Aims: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) shows lower effectiveness and higher dropouts among people with a low socioeconomic position (SEP) compared to those with a high SEP. This study evaluated an eHealth intervention aimed at supporting patients with a low SEP during their waiting period preceding CR. Methods and results: Participants with a low SEP in their waiting period before CR were randomized into an intervention group, receiving guidance videos, patient narratives, and practical tips, or into a control group. We evaluated adherence (usage metrics), acceptance (modified Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of use questionnaire), and changes in feelings of certainty and guidance between the waiting period's start and end. Semi-structured interviews provided complementary insights. The study involved 41 participants [median interquartile range (IQR) age 62 (14) years; 33 males], with 21 participants allocated to the intervention group, using the eHealth intervention for a median (IQR) duration of 16 (10) days, using it on a median (IQR) of 100% (25) of these days, and viewing 88% of the available messages. Key adherence themes were daily routine compatibility and curiosity. Acceptance rates were 86% for usability, 67% for satisfaction, and 43% for usefulness. No significant effects on certainty and guidance were observed, but qualitative data suggested that the intervention helped to inform and set expectations. Conclusion: The study found the eHealth intervention feasible for cardiac patients with a low SEP, with good adherence, usability, and satisfaction. However, it showed no effect on feelings of certainty and guidance. Through further optimization of its content, the intervention holds promise to improve emotional resilience during the waiting period. Registration: This trial is registered as follows: 'Evaluation of a Preparatory eHealth Intervention to Support Cardiac Patients During Their Waiting Period (PReCARE)' at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05698121, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05698121).
AB - Aims: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) shows lower effectiveness and higher dropouts among people with a low socioeconomic position (SEP) compared to those with a high SEP. This study evaluated an eHealth intervention aimed at supporting patients with a low SEP during their waiting period preceding CR. Methods and results: Participants with a low SEP in their waiting period before CR were randomized into an intervention group, receiving guidance videos, patient narratives, and practical tips, or into a control group. We evaluated adherence (usage metrics), acceptance (modified Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of use questionnaire), and changes in feelings of certainty and guidance between the waiting period's start and end. Semi-structured interviews provided complementary insights. The study involved 41 participants [median interquartile range (IQR) age 62 (14) years; 33 males], with 21 participants allocated to the intervention group, using the eHealth intervention for a median (IQR) duration of 16 (10) days, using it on a median (IQR) of 100% (25) of these days, and viewing 88% of the available messages. Key adherence themes were daily routine compatibility and curiosity. Acceptance rates were 86% for usability, 67% for satisfaction, and 43% for usefulness. No significant effects on certainty and guidance were observed, but qualitative data suggested that the intervention helped to inform and set expectations. Conclusion: The study found the eHealth intervention feasible for cardiac patients with a low SEP, with good adherence, usability, and satisfaction. However, it showed no effect on feelings of certainty and guidance. Through further optimization of its content, the intervention holds promise to improve emotional resilience during the waiting period. Registration: This trial is registered as follows: 'Evaluation of a Preparatory eHealth Intervention to Support Cardiac Patients During Their Waiting Period (PReCARE)' at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05698121, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05698121).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85215863634&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae084
DO - 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae084
M3 - Article
SN - 2634-3916
VL - 6
SP - 115
EP - 125
JO - European Heart Journal - Digital Health
JF - European Heart Journal - Digital Health
IS - 1
M1 - ztae084
ER -