An international survey to inform priorities for new guidelines on von Willebrand disease

Mohamad A. Kalot, Mohammed Al-Khatib, For the VWD working group, Nathan T. Connell, Veronica Flood, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Paula James, Reem A. Mustafa*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: von Willebrand disease (VWD) is an inherited bleeding disorder caused by a quantitative or qualitative dysfunction of von Willebrand factor. Clinicians, patients and other stakeholders have many questions about the diagnosis and management of the disease. Aim: To identify topics of highest importance to stakeholders that could be addressed by guidelines to be developed by the American Society of Hematology (ASH), the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), the National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF) and the World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH). Methods: A survey to determine and prioritize topics to be addressed in the collaborative development of guidelines for VWD was distributed to international stakeholders including patients, caregivers and healthcare providers (HCPs). Representatives of the four organizations coordinated the distribution strategy. The survey focused on both diagnosis and management of VWD, soliciting 7-point Likert-scale responses and open-ended comments, in English, French and Spanish. We conducted descriptive analysis with comparison of results by stakeholder type, gender and countries' income classification for the rating questions and qualitative conventional content data analysis for the open-ended responses. Results: A total of 601 participants responded to the survey (49% patients/caregivers and 51% healthcare providers). The highest priority topics identified were diagnostic criteria/classification, bleeding assessment tools and treatment options for women and surgical patients. In contrast, screening for anaemia and differentiating plasma-derived therapy versus recombinant therapies received lower ratings. Conclusion: This survey highlighted areas of importance to a diverse representation of stakeholders in the diagnosis and management of VWD, providing a framework for future guideline development and implementation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)106-116
Number of pages11
JournalHaemophilia
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding information:
American Society of Hematology

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An international survey to inform priorities for new guidelines on von Willebrand disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this