Anti‐GM1 IgG antibodies and campylobacter bacteria in Guillain‐Barré syndrome: Evidence of molecular mimicry

Peter G. Oomes, Bart C. Jacobs, Maarten P.H. Hazenberg, John R.J. Bänffer, Frans G.A. van der Meché*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

128 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In Guillain‐Barré syndrome antibodies to GM1 and the presence of an antecedent Campylobacter jeJunei infection are correlated with a more severe course of the disease. From a group of 137 consecutive GBS patients, 11 sera had elevated titers of anti‐GM1 IgG antibodies during the acute stage of disease. Each serum sample was preincubated with three different Penner serotypes of whole C. jeJunei (PEN O:4/59, PEN O:41) and Campylobacter coli (PEN O:22) bacteria. The PEN O:4/59 serotype, isolated from the stools of a Guillain‐Barré syndrome patient, inhibited 63 to 93% of the anti‐GM1 activity in 6 of 11 patients. The PEN O:41 inhibited 63 to 100% of the anti‐GM1 antibody activity in 9 of 11 patients. The PEN O:22 inhibited anti‐GM1 antibody activity in only 2 of 11 patients (80 and 86%). Two Guillain‐Barré syndrome patients did not show antibody absorption by any of the Campylobacter serotypes tested, although this does not exclude the involvement of other serotypes. An Escherichia coli control strain did not significantly absorb anti‐GM1 antibodies. The results of this study indicate that anti‐GM1 IgG antibodies in Guillain‐Barré syndrome sera recognize surface epitopes on whole Campylobacter bacteria and that this recognition is strain‐specific. This provides evidence for molecular mimicry in the pathogenesis of Guillain‐Barré syndrome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170-175
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Neurology
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1995

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anti‐GM1 IgG antibodies and campylobacter bacteria in Guillain‐Barré syndrome: Evidence of molecular mimicry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this