Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Application of HIPEC simulations for optimizing treatment delivery strategies

  • Daan R. Löke
  • , H. Petra Kok
  • , Roxan F.C.P.A. Helderman
  • , Bella Bokan
  • , Nicolaas A.P. Franken
  • , Arlene L. Oei
  • , Jurriaan B. Tuynman
  • , Pieter J. Tanis
  • , Johannes Crezee*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine (CEMM)
  • Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
100 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction:

Hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) aims to treat microscopic disease left after CytoReductive Surgery (CRS). Thermal enhancement depends on the temperatures achieved. Since the location of microscopic disease is unknown, a homogeneous treatment is required to completely eradicate the disease while limiting side effects. To ensure homogeneous delivery, treatment planning software has been developed. This study compares simulation results with clinical data and evaluates the impact of nine treatment strategies on thermal and drug distributions. 

Methods: 

For comparison with clinical data, three treatment strategies were simulated with different flow rates (1600-1800mL/min) and inflow temperatures (41.6–43.6 °C). Six additional treatment strategies were simulated, varying the number of inflow catheters, flow direction, and using step-up and step-down heating strategies. Thermal homogeneity and the risk of thermal injury were evaluated. 

Results: 

Simulated temperature distributions, core body temperatures, and systemic chemotherapeutic concentrations compared well with literature values. Treatment strategy was found to have a strong influence on the distributions. Additional inflow catheters could improve thermal distributions, provided flow rates are kept sufficiently high (>500 mL/min) for each catheter. High flow rates (1800 mL/min) combined with high inflow temperatures (43.6 °C) could lead to thermal damage, with (Formula presented.) values of up to 27 min. Step-up and step-down heating strategies allow for high temperatures with reduced risk of thermal damage.

Conclusion: 

The planning software provides valuable insight into the effects of different treatment strategies on peritoneal distributions. These strategies are designed to provide homogeneous treatment delivery while limiting thermal injury to normal tissue, thereby optimizing the effectiveness of HIPEC.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2218627
JournalInternational Journal of Hyperthermia
Volume40
Issue number1
Early online date16 Jul 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was funded by the Dutch Cancer Society, UVA grant number [10595 & 13420].

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Application of HIPEC simulations for optimizing treatment delivery strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this