TY - JOUR
T1 - Arthroscopic debridement does not enhance surgical treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures
T2 - a randomized controlled trial
AU - Selles, Caroline A.
AU - Mulders, Marjolein A.M.
AU - Colaris, Joost W.
AU - van Heijl, Mark
AU - Cleffken, Berry I.
AU - Schep, Niels W.L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019.
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - The aim of this study was to determine the difference in functional outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with and without arthroscopic debridement in adults with displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures. In this multicentre trial, 50 patients were randomized between ORIF with or without arthroscopic debridement. The primary outcome measure was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score. Secondary outcome measures were Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, pain scores, range of wrist motion, grip strength, and complications. Median PRWE was worse for the intervention group at 3 months and was equal for both groups at 12 months. The secondary outcome measures did not show consistent patterns of differences at different time-points of follow-up. We conclude that patients treated with additional arthroscopy to remove intra-articular hematoma and debris did not have better outcomes than those treated with ORIF alone. We therefore do not recommend arthroscopy for removal of hematoma and debris when surgically fixing distal radius fractures. Level of evidence: I
AB - The aim of this study was to determine the difference in functional outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with and without arthroscopic debridement in adults with displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures. In this multicentre trial, 50 patients were randomized between ORIF with or without arthroscopic debridement. The primary outcome measure was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score. Secondary outcome measures were Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, pain scores, range of wrist motion, grip strength, and complications. Median PRWE was worse for the intervention group at 3 months and was equal for both groups at 12 months. The secondary outcome measures did not show consistent patterns of differences at different time-points of follow-up. We conclude that patients treated with additional arthroscopy to remove intra-articular hematoma and debris did not have better outcomes than those treated with ORIF alone. We therefore do not recommend arthroscopy for removal of hematoma and debris when surgically fixing distal radius fractures. Level of evidence: I
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074865636&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1753193419866128
DO - 10.1177/1753193419866128
M3 - Article
C2 - 31686586
AN - SCOPUS:85074865636
VL - 45
SP - 327
EP - 332
JO - Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume
JF - Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume
SN - 1753-1934
IS - 4
ER -