TY - JOUR
T1 - Artificial Intelligence-based Segmentation of Residual Pancreatic Cancer in Resection Specimens Following Neoadjuvant Treatment (ISGPP-2)
T2 - International Improvement and Validation Study
AU - Janssen, Boris V.
AU - International Study Group of Pancreatic Pathologists (ISGPP)
AU - Pancreatobiliary and Hepatic Artificial Intelligence Research (PHAIR) Consortium
AU - Oteman, Bart
AU - Ali, Mahsoem
AU - Valkema, Pieter A.
AU - Adsay, Volkan
AU - Basturk, Olca
AU - Chatterjee, Deyali
AU - Chou, Angela
AU - Crobach, Stijn
AU - Doukas, Michael
AU - Drillenburg, Paul
AU - Esposito, Irene
AU - Gill, Anthony J.
AU - Hong, Seung Mo
AU - Jansen, Casper
AU - Kliffen, Mike
AU - Mittal, Anubhav
AU - Samra, Jas
AU - Van Velthuysen, Marie Louise F.
AU - Yavas, Aslihan
AU - Kazemier, Geert
AU - Verheij, Joanne
AU - Steyerberg, Ewout
AU - Besselink, Marc G.
AU - Wang, Huamin
AU - Verbeke, Caroline
AU - Fariña, Arantza
AU - De Boer, Onno J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has become routine in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Pathologists examine pancreatic cancer resection specimens to evaluate the effect of NAT. However, an automated scoring system to objectively quantify residual pancreatic cancer (RPC) is currently lacking. Herein, we developed and validated the first automated segmentation model using artificial intelligence techniques to objectively quantify RPC. Digitized histopathological tissue slides were included from resected pancreatic cancer specimens from 14 centers in 7 countries in Europe, North America, Australia, and Asia. Four different scanner types were used: Philips (56%), Hamamatsu (27%), 3DHistech (10%), and Leica (7%). Regions of interest were annotated and classified as cancer, non-neoplastic pancreatic ducts, and others. A U-Net model was trained to detect RPC. Validation consisted of by-scanner internal-external cross-validation. Overall, 528 unique hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) slides from 528 patients were included. In the individual Philips, Hamamatsu, 3DHistech, and Leica scanner cross-validations, mean F1 scores of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.84), 0.80 (0.78-0.83), 0.76 (0.65-0.78), and 0.71 (0.65-0.78) were achieved, respectively. In the meta-analysis of the cross-validations, the mean F1 score was 0.78 (0.71-0.84). A final model was trained on the entire data set. This ISGPP model is the first segmentation model using artificial intelligence techniques to objectively quantify RPC following NAT. The internally-externally cross-validated model in this study demonstrated robust performance in detecting RPC in specimens. The ISGPP model, now made publically available, enables automated RPC segmentation and forms the basis for objective NAT response evaluation in pancreatic cancer.
AB - Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has become routine in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Pathologists examine pancreatic cancer resection specimens to evaluate the effect of NAT. However, an automated scoring system to objectively quantify residual pancreatic cancer (RPC) is currently lacking. Herein, we developed and validated the first automated segmentation model using artificial intelligence techniques to objectively quantify RPC. Digitized histopathological tissue slides were included from resected pancreatic cancer specimens from 14 centers in 7 countries in Europe, North America, Australia, and Asia. Four different scanner types were used: Philips (56%), Hamamatsu (27%), 3DHistech (10%), and Leica (7%). Regions of interest were annotated and classified as cancer, non-neoplastic pancreatic ducts, and others. A U-Net model was trained to detect RPC. Validation consisted of by-scanner internal-external cross-validation. Overall, 528 unique hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) slides from 528 patients were included. In the individual Philips, Hamamatsu, 3DHistech, and Leica scanner cross-validations, mean F1 scores of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.84), 0.80 (0.78-0.83), 0.76 (0.65-0.78), and 0.71 (0.65-0.78) were achieved, respectively. In the meta-analysis of the cross-validations, the mean F1 score was 0.78 (0.71-0.84). A final model was trained on the entire data set. This ISGPP model is the first segmentation model using artificial intelligence techniques to objectively quantify RPC following NAT. The internally-externally cross-validated model in this study demonstrated robust performance in detecting RPC in specimens. The ISGPP model, now made publically available, enables automated RPC segmentation and forms the basis for objective NAT response evaluation in pancreatic cancer.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85199366924
U2 - 10.1097/pas.0000000000002270
DO - 10.1097/pas.0000000000002270
M3 - Article
C2 - 38985503
AN - SCOPUS:85199366924
SN - 0147-5185
VL - 48
SP - 1108
EP - 1116
JO - American Journal of Surgical Pathology
JF - American Journal of Surgical Pathology
IS - 9
ER -