TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing a patient's individual risk of biopsy-detectable prostate cancer
T2 - Be aware of case mix heterogeneity and a priori likelihood
AU - Verbeek, Jan F.M.
AU - Nieboer, Daan
AU - Steyerberg, Ewout W.
AU - Roobol, Monique J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/10/1
Y1 - 2021/10/1
N2 - The relation between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and other relevant prebiopsy information is often combined in a risk calculator (RC). If the setting for RC use differs from that in which it was developed, there is a risk of making clinical decisions based on incorrect estimates of the absolute risk. The ERSPC-MRI RC predicts clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC; Gleason ≥ 3 + 4) on targeted and systematic biopsy using information on PSA, digital rectal examination, prostate volume, age, previous negative biopsy, and Prostate Imaging-Recording and Data System score. This calculator was developed on a clinical cohort of 961 men (2012-2017) with a csPC prevalence of 36%. Discrimination was good (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.84). With the increasing use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, we foresee that this RC will also be used for men with a lower a priori likelihood of PC. We investigated the effect of such a scenario on individual risk predictions. A small update of the intercept for the calculator can restore the accuracy to support decision-making with locally valid risk estimates. PATIENT SUMMARY: Decisions on who to refer for a prostate biopsy with its risk of sepsis and overdiagnosis require more than a prostate-specific antigen test. A prediction tool may take other relevant prebiopsy information into account, but may need to be updated to contemporary center-specific settings to provide accurate estimates of the risk of having prostate cancer.
AB - The relation between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and other relevant prebiopsy information is often combined in a risk calculator (RC). If the setting for RC use differs from that in which it was developed, there is a risk of making clinical decisions based on incorrect estimates of the absolute risk. The ERSPC-MRI RC predicts clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC; Gleason ≥ 3 + 4) on targeted and systematic biopsy using information on PSA, digital rectal examination, prostate volume, age, previous negative biopsy, and Prostate Imaging-Recording and Data System score. This calculator was developed on a clinical cohort of 961 men (2012-2017) with a csPC prevalence of 36%. Discrimination was good (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.84). With the increasing use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, we foresee that this RC will also be used for men with a lower a priori likelihood of PC. We investigated the effect of such a scenario on individual risk predictions. A small update of the intercept for the calculator can restore the accuracy to support decision-making with locally valid risk estimates. PATIENT SUMMARY: Decisions on who to refer for a prostate biopsy with its risk of sepsis and overdiagnosis require more than a prostate-specific antigen test. A prediction tool may take other relevant prebiopsy information into account, but may need to be updated to contemporary center-specific settings to provide accurate estimates of the risk of having prostate cancer.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081620307&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.euo.2019.07.012
DO - 10.1016/j.euo.2019.07.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 31431394
AN - SCOPUS:85081620307
SN - 2588-9311
VL - 4
SP - 813
EP - 816
JO - European urology oncology
JF - European urology oncology
IS - 5
ER -