Abstract
This article analyzes the ways in which the Belgian and Dutch governments legitimize the deportation of unaccompanied minors, by focusing on the interplay of intersectional boundary work and bordering practices. Building on the work of postcolonial feminists and scholars studying the role of identity and cultural values in migration policy, the article highlights that deportation relies on and reifies gendered, racialized, and classed representations of the family, child-rearing practices, and the roles attributed to children. A paternalistic attitude that spurs the moral necessity to protect children mediates the exclusionary potential of such boundaries for deporting states.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 323-346 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Social Politics |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022 The Author(s).
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Research programs
- ESSB PA
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing adequate homes and proper parenthood: How gendered and racialized family norms legitimize the deportation of unaccompanied minors in Belgium and the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver