Assessment of integrated electromagnetic tracking for dwell position monitoring in a clinical HDR brachytherapy setting for prostate cancer

Ioannis Androulakis*, Jeremy Godart, Laura E van Heerden, Lorne Luthart, René Rijnsdorp, Mischa S Hoogeman, Henrike Westerveld, Miranda E M C Christianen, Jan Willem M Mens, Rosemarijn van Paassen, Eva M Negenman, Remi A Nout, Inger-Karine K Kolkman-Deurloo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: 

Electromagnetic Tracking (EMT) technology has been integrated in a prototype high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) afterloading device. Its potential for dwell position (DP) monitoring has earlier been demonstrated in prostate phantoms. However, its performance for prostate BT in the clinical setting remains to be assessed.

AIM: 

Assess the reliability and value of EMT measurements in transrectal ultrasound-based (TRUS-based) and computed tomography-based (CT-based) prostate HDR-BT.

METHODS: 

EMT measurements were conducted on 20 patients undergoing dual-fraction prostate HDR-BT monotherapy. In each treatment fraction an individual TRUS-based or CT-based treatment plan was generated. The measurements were compared to DPs of manually reconstructed needles in those TRUS-based or CT-based treatment plans. An internal reference sensor was also placed in one needle to assess internal movement levels and its potential for movement correction.

RESULTS: 

For TRUS-based treatments, median Euclidean distances (ED) of 1.00 mm were observed between EMT measurements and manual DP determination. Reference sensor movement was minimal at a median of 0.18 mm. For DPs measured in the CT-room and treatment room, median EDs of 1.60 mm and 2.24 mm compared to CT-based DP determination respectively were observed, indicating the system's ability to detect changes in implant geometry over time and after patient repositioning. Median reference sensor movement of 0.97 mm was observed. Implementing reference sensor-based movement correction led to a significant but small decrease in ED for CT-based treatments.

CONCLUSION: 

EMT is suitable for TRUS-based prostate HDR-BT quality assurance and error detection. While EMT can identify changes in implant geometry in CT-based prostate HDR-BT treatments, it showed lower accuracy in this setting.

Original languageEnglish
Article number110501
Number of pages7
JournalRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
Volume200
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of integrated electromagnetic tracking for dwell position monitoring in a clinical HDR brachytherapy setting for prostate cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this