Assessment of mortality and performance status in critically ill cancer patients: A retrospective cohort study

Esther N. van der Zee*, Lianne M. Noordhuis, Jelle L. Epker, Nikki van Leeuwen, Bas P.L. Wijnhoven, Dominique D. Benoit, Jan Bakker, Erwin J.O. Kompanje

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction Given clinicians’ frequent concerns about unfavourable outcomes, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) triage decisions in acutely ill cancer patients can be difficult, as clinicians may have doubts about the appropriateness of an ICU admission. To aid to this decision making, we studied the survival and performance status of cancer patients 2 years following an unplanned ICU admission. Materials and methods This was a retrospective cohort study in a large tertiary referral university hospital in the Netherlands. We categorized all adult patients with an unplanned ICU admission in 2017 into two groups: patients with or without an active malignancy. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s Chi-square tests and the Mann-Whitney U tests were used to evaluate the primary objective 2-year mortality and performance status. A good performance status was defined as ECOG performance status 0 (fully active) or 1 (restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out light work). A multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with 2-year mortality within cancer patients. Results Of the 1046 unplanned ICU admissions, 125 (12%) patients had cancer. The 2-year mortality in patients with cancer was significantly higher than in patients without cancer (72% and 42.5%, P <0.001). The median performance status at 2 years in cancer patients was 1 (IQR 0–2). Only an ECOG performance status of 2 (OR 8.94; 95% CI 1.21–65.89) was independently associated with 2-year mortality. Conclusions In our study, the majority of the survivors have a good performance status 2 years after ICU admission. However, at that point, three-quarter of these cancer patients had died, and mortality in cancer patients was significantly higher than in patients without cancer. ICU admission decisions in acutely ill cancer patients should be based on performance status, severity of illness and long-term prognosis, and this should be communicated in the shared decision making. An ICU admission decision should not solely be based on the presence of a malignancy.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0252771
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume16
Issue number6 June 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of mortality and performance status in critically ill cancer patients: A retrospective cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this