Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Association between pretreatment emotional distress and neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade response in melanoma

  • Itske Fraterman
  • , Irene L.M. Reijers
  • , Petros Dimitriadis
  • , Annegien Broeks
  • , M. Gonzalez
  • , A. M.M. Menzies
  • , Marta Lopez-Yurda
  • , Ellen Kapiteijn
  • , Astrid A.M. van der Veldt
  • , Karijn P.M. Suijkerbuijk
  • , Geke A.P. Hospers
  • , Georgina V. Long
  • , Christian U. Blank
  • , Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
  • The University of Sydney
  • Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals (St. Leonards)
  • Leiden University Medical Centre
  • Utrecht University
  • University Medical Centre Groningen
  • Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL)
  • Tilburg University
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

60 Citations (Scopus)
93 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) outperforms adjuvant ICB for treatment of stage IIIB–D melanoma, but potential biomarkers of response, such as interferon-gamma (IFNγ) signature and tumor mutational burden (TMB), are insufficient. Preclinical studies suggest that emotional distress (ED) can negatively affect antitumor immune responses via β-adrenergic or glucocorticoid signaling. We performed a post hoc analysis evaluating the association between pretreatment ED and clinical responses after neoadjuvant ICB treatment in patients with stage IIIB–D melanoma in the phase 2 PRADO trial (NCT02977052). The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer scale for emotional functioning was used to identify patients with ED (n = 28) versus those without (n = 60). Pretreatment ED was significantly associated with reduced major pathologic responses (46% versus 65%, adjusted odds ratio 0.20, P = 0.038) after adjusting for IFNγ signature and TMB, reduced 2-year relapse-free survival (74% versus 91%, adjusted hazard ratio 3.81, P = 0.034) and reduced 2-year distant metastasis-free survival (78% versus 95%, adjusted hazard ratio 4.33, P = 0.040) after adjusting for IFNγ signature. RNA sequencing analyses of baseline patient samples could not identify clear β-adrenergic- or glucocorticoid-driven mechanisms associated with these reduced outcomes. Pretreatment ED may be a marker associated with clinical responses after neoadjuvant ICB in melanoma and warrants further investigation. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02977052 .

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3090-3099
Number of pages10
JournalNature Medicine
Volume29
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association between pretreatment emotional distress and neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade response in melanoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this