Association of Diabetes Medication With Open-Angle Glaucoma, Age-Related Macular Degeneration, and Cataract in the Rotterdam Study

Joëlle E. Vergroesen, Eric F. Thee, Fariba Ahmadizar, Cornelia M. Van Duijn, Bruno H. Stricker, Maryam Kavousi, Caroline C.W. Klaver, Wishal D. Ramdas*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Importance: Recent studies suggest that the diabetes drug metformin has a protective effect on open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). However, studies have not addressed the critical issue of confounding by indication, and associations have not been evaluated in a large prospective cohort. Objective: To determine the association between diabetes medication and the common eye diseases OAG, AMD, and cataract and to evaluate their cumulative lifetime risks in a large cohort study. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included participants from 3 independent cohorts from the prospective, population-based Rotterdam Study between April 23, 1990, and June 25, 2014. Participants were monitored for incident eye diseases (OAG, AMD, cataract) and had baseline measurements of serum glucose. Data on diabetes medication use and data from ophthalmologic examinations were gathered. Exposures: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and the diabetes medications metformin, insulin, and sulfonylurea derivatives. Main Outcomes and Measures: Diagnosis and cumulative lifetime risk of OAG, AMD, and cataract. Results: This study included 11260 participants (mean [SD] age, 65.1 [9.8]; 6610 women [58.7%]). T2D was diagnosed in 2406 participants (28.4%), OAG was diagnosed in 324 of 7394 participants (4.4%), AMD was diagnosed in 1935 of 10993 participants (17.6%), and cataract was diagnosed in 4203 of 11260 participants (37.3%). Untreated T2D was associated with a higher risk of OAG (odds ratio [OR], 1.50; 95% CI, 1.06-2.13; P =.02), AMD (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.11-1.64; P =.003), and cataract (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.39-1.92; P <.001). T2D treated with metformin was associated with a lower risk of OAG (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.08-0.41; P <.001). Other diabetes medication (ie, insulin, sulfonylurea derivates) was associated with a lower risk of AMD (combined OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.55; P <.001). The cumulative lifetime risk of OAG was lower for individuals taking metformin (1.5%; 95% CI, 0.01%-3.1%) than for individuals without T2D (7.2%; 95% CI, 5.7%-8.7%); the lifetime risk of AMD was lower for individuals taking other diabetes medication (17.0%; 95% CI, 5.8%-26.8% vs 33.1%; 95% CI, 30.6%-35.6%). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study suggest that, although diabetes was clearly associated with cataract, diabetes medication was not. Treatment with metformin was associated with a lower risk of OAG, and other diabetes medication was associated with a lower risk of AMD. Proof of benefit would require interventional clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)674-681
Number of pages8
JournalJAMA Ophthalmology
Volume140
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jul 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Funding/Support: This study was supported by Stichting Lijf & Leven; Henkes Stichting, Rotterdamse Stichting voor Blindenbelangen; the Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences (Dr Klaver); grant 2018-34 from Landelijke Stichting voor Blinden en Slechtzienden; Oogfonds MaculaFonds; grant 2019-12 from Glaucoomfonds; Erasmus Medical Center, Erasmus University, Netherlands; Organization for the Health Research and Development; the Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly; the Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science; the Ministry for Health, Welfare, and Sports; the European Commission; and the Municipality of Rotterdam.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association of Diabetes Medication With Open-Angle Glaucoma, Age-Related Macular Degeneration, and Cataract in the Rotterdam Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this