Association of Uric Acid Genetic Risk Score With Blood Pressure The Rotterdam Study

S Sedaghat, Raha Pazoki, André Uitterlinden, Bert Hofman, Bruno Stricker, Arfan Ikram, OH Franco Duran, Abbas Dehghan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

High levels of serum uric acid are associated with hypertension in observational studies. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of uric acid gene variants with blood pressure. We studied 5791 participants aged >= 55 years from the Rotterdam Study. Thirty gene variants identified for serum uric acid level were used to compile genetic risk score (GRS). We used linear regression models to investigate the association of the uric acid GRS with systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the whole study population and separately in participants with and without comorbidities and medication use. In the age-and sex-adjusted model, each SD increase in uric acid GRS was associated with 0.75 mm Hg lower systolic blood pressure (95% confidence interval, -1.31 to -0.19) and 0.42 mm Hg lower diastolic blood pressure (95% confidence interval, -0.72 to -0.13). The association did not attenuate after further adjustment for antihypertensive medication use and conventional cardiovascular risk factors. In subgroup analysis, the association of uric acid GRS with systolic blood pressure was significantly stronger in participants (n=885) on diuretic treatment (P for interaction, 0.007). In conclusion, we found that higher uric acid GRS is associated with lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Diuretics treatment may modify the association of uric acid genetic risk score and systolic blood pressure. Our study suggests that genome wide association study's findings can be associated with an intermediate factor or have a pleiotropic role and, therefore, should be applied for Mendelian Randomization with caution.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)1061-1066
Number of pages6
JournalHypertension
Volume64
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this