Associations between hair-derived cannabinoid levels, self-reported use, and cannabis-related problems

Emese Kroon*, Janna Cousijn, Francesca Filbey, Christian Berchtold, Tina M Binz, Lauren Kuhns

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

RATIONALE: 

As cannabis potency and cannabis use are increasing in newly legalized markets, it is increasingly important to measure and examine the effects of cannabinoid exposure.

OBJECTIVES: 

The current study aims to assess how hair-derived cannabinoid concentrations - offering insight into three-month cumulative exposure - are associated with common self-report measures of cannabis use and cannabis use-related problems.

METHODS: 

74 near-daily dependent cannabis users self-reported their quantity of cannabis use, cannabis use-related problems, and estimated cannabis potency. Hair samples were provided to quantify Δ9-THC, CBD, and CBN using LC-MS/MS and THC-consumption was verified by analyzing THC-COOH in hair using GC-MS/MS.

RESULTS: Cannabinoids were detectable in 95.95% of the hair samples from individuals who tested positive on a urine screen for cannabis. Δ9-THC concentrations were positively associated with measures of self-reported potency (relative potency, potency category, and perceived 'high'), but Δ9-THC, CBD, CBN concentrations and THC/CBD ratio were not associated with self-reported quantity of use. Self-reported potency, but not hair-derived concentrations, were associated with withdrawal and craving. Self-reported quantity of cannabis use, but not cannabinoid concentrations, were associated with cannabis use-related problems.

CONCLUSIONS:

 The use of hair-derived cannabinoid quantification is supported for detecting cannabis use in near-daily users, but the lack of associations between hair-derived cannabinoid concentrations and self-report measures of use does not support the use of hair analyses alone for quantification of cannabinoid exposure. Further research comparing hair-derived cannabinoid concentrations with other biological matrices (e.g. plasma) and self-report is necessary to further evaluate the validity of hair analyses for this purpose.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1237-1244
Number of pages8
JournalPsychopharmacology
Volume241
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Feb 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Research programs

  • ESSB PSY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Associations between hair-derived cannabinoid levels, self-reported use, and cannabis-related problems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this