Activities per year
Abstract
In the 1650s, two professors of philosophy at the University of Utrecht defended atomism. Interestingly, one of them, Johannes de Bruyn, is considered to be a staunch Cartesian, while the other, Daniel Voet, was a neo-Aristotelian and strongly opposed to Descartes’s philosophy. This article examines this curious situation and analyses the theories of both professors. While converging with Gassendi on several crucial points, their theories relied mainly on other sources. Since De Bruyn’s atomistic view has never been studied before, the main part of the article is devoted to him and his sources. Surprisingly, it turns out that David Gorlaeus was a source of inspiration for De Bruyn’s development of a new type of Cartesianism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 420-444 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Erudition and the Republic of Letters |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© ERIK-JAN BOS, 2023.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Atomism and Cartesianism: Gassendi and Gorlaeus (and More) in Utrecht Disputations in the 1650s'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Activities
- 1 Invited talk
-
Gassendi in disputations submitted at Utrecht University in the 1650s
Bos, E.-J. (Invited speaker)
18 Feb 2022Activity: Talk or presentation › Invited talk › Academic
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver