Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Authors' response to Hogan

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorProfessional

23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In response to our Perspective on nonhuman primate models for SARS, which accompanied the article by Lawler et al., Robert Hogan questions the usefulness of nonhuman primates as good models for SARS.

As demonstrated by several groups, SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) replicates to high titers in the respiratory tract of a surprisingly broad range of animal species, albeit showing remarkable differences in cell tropism. We have argued that efficient infection of type 1 and 2 pneumocytes as seen in macaques and humans—most likely due to the similarities in the spike protein binding domains of the host SARS-CoV receptor ACE2—is a prerequisite for the SARS-CoV infection–induced pathology observed in humans. So far there is no strong evidence that a similar tropism is observed in other animal species.

[...]
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1657-1658
Number of pages2
JournalPLoS Medicine
Volume3
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Sept 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Authors' response to Hogan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • Nonhuman primate models for SARS

    Haagmans, B. & Osterhaus, A., 2006, In: PLoS Medicine (print). 3, 5, p. 598-599 2 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Open Access
    File
    24 Citations (Scopus)
    22 Downloads (Pure)

Cite this