Authorship in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Pravesh S. Gadjradj*, Mamta Jalimsing, Sandhia Jalimsing, Istifari Voigt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background and Objective: According to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), authorship should be offered based on fulfilling four criteria. Honorary authorship (HA) is a term used for authors enlisted who did not fulfill these criteria. The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of HA in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Material and Methods: In 2020, a twenty-two question survey was sent to corresponding authors of four high-impact journals in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. The survey covered (1) demographics, (2) awareness of authorship guidelines and decision-making of authorship, and (3) honorary authorship. Results: The response rate was 24.8%. Of the respondents, 81.1% was aware of the issue of guidelines on authorship, while 56.3% was aware of the issue of HA. Yet, 15.5% of the respondents felt that one or more of their co-authors did not deserve authorship based on the ICMJE-guidelines. Conclusion: Based on the estimated proportions of HA, attempts should be made by universities, medical journals and individual researchers to further reduce authorship misuse.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)330-335
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Authorship in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this