Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Automated interstitial lung abnormalities detection at CT: external validation and potential recognition of traction bronchiectasis/bronchiolectasis

  • Yusei Nakamura*
  • , Taiki Fukuda
  • , Kota Aoyagi
  • , Masami Kawagishi
  • , Yuki Ko
  • , Noriaki Wada
  • , Takuya Hino
  • , Tomoyuki Hida
  • , Meike W Vernooij
  • , Daniel Bos
  • , Daan W Loth
  • , Masahiro Ozaki
  • , Akihiro Koga
  • , Heida Bjarnadottir
  • , Valborg Gudmundsdottir
  • , Gunnar Gudmundsson
  • , Vilmundur Gudnason
  • , Mizuki Nishino
  • , David C Christiani
  • , Gary M Hunninghake
  • Kousei Ishigami, Hiroto Hatabu
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Canon Medical Systems Corporation
  • Canon Inc.
  • Kyushu University
  • Amphia Hospital
  • Institute for Advanced Diagnosis for Rare Diseases & Conditions K.K.
  • University of Iceland
  • Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

PURPOSE: 

An artificial intelligence (AI) system for detecting interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) was previously developed but requires external validation. This study aimed to examine the robustness across different populations and investigate associations between the system outputs and traction bronchiectasis/bronchiolectasis severity patterns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: 

CT scans from population-based samples of the Rotterdam Study (2018-2019) and the Age Gene/Environment Susceptibility Reykjavik (AGES-Reykjavik) Study (baseline CT: 2002-2006, follow-up CT: 2007-2011) were used in this secondary analysis of the two cohorts. The AI system calculated ILA probability score (AI score) in the range from 0 to 1. Three experienced readers evaluated independently all CT scans for ILA, and two chest radiologists assessed traction bronchiectasis/bronchiolectasis using the 4-scale traction bronchiectasis/bronchiolectasis index (TBI) for severity by consensus. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS: 

The system analyzed 932 CT scans of the Rotterdam Study (mean participant age, 79.6 years ± 4.3 (SD), 482 women) and 5242 CT scans of the AGES-Reykjavik Study (mean participant age, 76.4 years ± 5.6, 3032 women), and achieved area under the ROC curve of 0.841 (95% CI 0.804, 0.879) and 0.823 (95% CI 0.798, 0.847), respectively. AI scores correlated with readers' certainty, decreasing from unanimous ILA cases to No-ILA cases. Higher baseline AI scores correlated with greater severity of traction bronchiectasis/bronchiolectasis (TBI-3: 0.931 [IQR, 0.911-0.932], TBI-2: 0.738 [IQR, 0.406-0.880], TBI-1: 0.537 [IQR, 0.317-0.761], TBI-0: 0.250 [IQR, 0.136-0.455]).

CONCLUSION: 

The system demonstrated robust ILA detection performance across different populations, with AI scores showing associations with traction bronchiectasis/bronchiolectasis severity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)660-672
Number of pages13
JournalJapanese Journal of Radiology
Volume44
Issue number4
Early online date11 Dec 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Automated interstitial lung abnormalities detection at CT: external validation and potential recognition of traction bronchiectasis/bronchiolectasis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this