Abstract
In this contribution, the challenges that autonomous decision-making (AI) poses for law is approached by a review of the so-called »accountability gap.« To get a better understanding of the fundamental problem that economic analysis of law has with autonomous decision-making, different routes for solving the problem are scrutinized. The analysis shows that the toolbox of Law and Economics does not yet provide a clear answer. Doctrinal law can also give no conclusive answers. Instead, this contribution proposes taking a closer look into legal history. The recourse to legal history can neither replace theory, nor can legal rules from the past be transplanted to the present. Yet, a look into legal history can provide fresh ideas on how to deal effectively with the challenges of autonomous decision-making.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 466-487 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics |
| Volume | 181 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 25 Jun 2025 |
Bibliographical note
JEL classification code: K13, K24, B41Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Mohr Siebeck.
Erasmus Sectorplan
- Sector plan SSH-Breed
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Autonomous Decision Making as a Challenge for Legal Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver