Abstract
In the summer of 2020, the United States Supreme Court will deliver its judgment on the first transgender rights case before it, R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. In the lack of federal laws protecting transgenders from discrimination, the case will be a landmark, should it answer the question before it affirmatively, namely “whether Title VII [of the Civil Rights Act of 1964] prohibits discrimination against transgender people based on their status as transgender or sex stereotyping.’ The ECJ has dealt with the same issue in 1996 for its landmark decision of P. v S. and Cornwall County Council in which the European Court has decided that Council Directive 76/207 on the principle of equal treatment for men and women, which -like the US situation- was the only available piece of legislation at the time, protected transgender persons against discrimination. This paper offers a contribution to the debate around whether the prohibition contained in Title VII to discriminate “because of … sex” covers transgender discrimination by analyzing the said ECJ case, and applying the principles utilized therein to the case before the US Supreme Court.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | GenIUS - Rivista di studi giuridici sull'orientamento sessuale e l'identità di genere |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 20 May 2020 |
Research programs
- EUC
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '“Because of … sex”: Inspirations from the European Court of Justice for the United States Supreme Court in the First Transgender Rights Case Before It’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver