Benefit vs potential harm of genome-wide prenatal cfDNA testing requires further investigation and should not be dismissed based on current data

MN Bekker; L Henneman; MV Macville; EA Sistermans; Robert-Jan Galjaard

doi:10.1002/uog.22030

Benefit vs potential harm of genome-wide prenatal cfDNA testing requires further investigation and should not be dismissed based on current data

MN Bekker, L Henneman, MV Macville, EA Sistermans, Robert-Jan Galjaard

Clinical Genetics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

42 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	695-696
Number of pages	2
Journal	Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume	55
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22030
Publication status	Published - 2020

Research programs

EMC OR-01

Access to Document

10.1002/uog.22030

Repub_127273.pdfFinal published version, 63.2 KB

Cite this

@article{025226454c134e39af725902603c8cbf,

title = "Benefit vs potential harm of genome-wide prenatal cfDNA testing requires further investigation and should not be dismissed based on current data",

author = "MN Bekker and L Henneman and MV Macville and EA Sistermans and Robert-Jan Galjaard",

year = "2020",

doi = "10.1002/uog.22030",

language = "English",

volume = "55",

pages = "695--696",

journal = "Ultrasound in Obstetrics \& Gynecology",

issn = "0960-7692",

publisher = "John Wiley \& Sons Ltd.",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benefit vs potential harm of genome-wide prenatal cfDNA testing requires further investigation and should not be dismissed based on current data

AU - Bekker, MN

AU - Henneman, L

AU - Macville, MV

AU - Sistermans, EA

AU - Galjaard, Robert-Jan

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

U2 - 10.1002/uog.22030

DO - 10.1002/uog.22030

M3 - Article

C2 - 32356934

SN - 0960-7692

VL - 55

SP - 695

EP - 696

JO - Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

JF - Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

IS - 5

ER -