Between unity and disparity: current treatment protocols for common orofacial clefts in European expert centres

V. L. van Roey*, Aebele B. Mink van der Molen, I. M.J. Mathijssen, Ilze Akota, Corstiaan C. Breugem, Eduardo Miguel Craveiro Matos, Caroline Dissaux, Krzysztof Dowgierd, Andreja Eberlinc, Malin Hakelius, Arja Heliövaara, Greet Z. Hens, Roman H. Khonsari, Hans Mark, Fabio Mazzoleni, Maria C. Meazzini, Montserrat Munill Ferrer, Marloes E. Nienhuijs, Petra Peterson, Katherine PiacentileJosep Rubio Palau, Hans C. Sylvester-Jensen, Víctor Zafra Vallejo, Sarah L. Versnel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is considerable variability in the management of common orofacial clefts across Europe, reflecting differing opinions on optimal treatments. An updated overview of treatment protocols for orofacial clefts across 26 expert centres in the European Reference Network CRANIO is presented here. A structured questionnaire was distributed to map the surgical protocol and additional standard procedures for cleft palate (CP), unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), and bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). A surgical protocol was defined as the unique combination of a sequence of standard surgeries, their timing, and the surgical techniques employed. Overall, 33 unique surgical protocols for CP, 54 for UCLP, and 51 for BCLP were identified. Notable findings included the trend towards early hard palate closure, uniform timing of lip closure, and the popularity of primary cleft rhinoplasty. Nevertheless, practice variations were most pronounced in the timing of alveolar closure, the number of standard surgeries, and the application of additional standard procedures. This study highlights the diversity of treatment protocols across Europe, despite considerable convergence of treatment practices over time. To allow for further convergence, establishing objective criteria for protocol selection, adequate documentation of customizations, and consensus on the terminology of surgical techniques, are necessary.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Dec 2024

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Between unity and disparity: current treatment protocols for common orofacial clefts in European expert centres'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this