Abstract
Decision making is in general quite sophisticated but at the same time hindered by biases. Biases present flaws in decision making that go beyond an incidental error, and are thus structural and to some extent predictable. One famous example is the myside bias: the structural overconfidence that we are right in any situation. Given its ubiquity, bias has also been shown to occur in important contexts such as legal decision making. Moreover, even individuals who serve as expert witnesses in legal proceedings do not seem to be free from bias. In this chapter, first, some general remarks about biases are made, and examples of biases are given. Next, sources of bias are discussed, and, third, examples of biases in the context of legal decision making are reviewed. Finally, the tenacity of biases, and hence the challenge of finding remedies, is discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Legal and Forensic Psychology |
| Subtitle of host publication | What Is It and What It Is Not |
| Editors | Irena Bošković |
| Publisher | Springer Nature |
| Chapter | 10 |
| Pages | 145-159 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Edition | 1 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783031758751 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783031758744 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Feb 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024. All rights reserved.
Research programs
- ESSB PSY
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Binding problems: Biases in legal and forensic psychology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver