Biological drivers of clinical phenotype in myelofibrosis

John Mascarenhas*, Hélène F.E. Gleitz, Helen T. Chifotides, Claire N. Harrison, Srdan Verstovsek, Alessandro Maria Vannucchi, Raajit K. Rampal, Jean Jacques Kiladjian, William Vainchenker, Ronald Hoffman, Rebekka K. Schneider, Alan F. List

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative disorder that exhibits considerable biological and clinical heterogeneity. At the two ends of the disease spectrum are the myelodepletive or cytopenic phenotype and the myeloproliferative phenotype. The cytopenic phenotype has a high prevalence in primary MF (PMF) and is characterized by low blood counts. The myeloproliferative phenotype is typically associated with secondary MF (SMF), mild anemia, minimal need for transfusion support, and normal to mild thrombocytopenia. Differences in somatic driver mutations and allelic burden, as well as the acquisition of non-driver mutations further influences these phenotypic differences, prognosis, and response to therapies such as JAK2 inhibitors. The outcome of patients with the cytopenic phenotype are comparatively worse and frequently pose a challenge to treat given the inherent exacerbation of cytopenias. Recent data indicate that an innate immune deregulated state that hinges on the myddosome-IRAK-NFκB axis favors the cytopenic myelofibrosis phenotype and offers opportunity for novel treatment approaches. We will review the biological and clinical features of the MF disease spectrum and associated treatment considerations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)255-264
Number of pages10
JournalLeukemia
Volume37
Issue number2
Early online date24 Nov 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biological drivers of clinical phenotype in myelofibrosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this