Can We Have Your ID Please? Understanding Differential LGBTQ+ Perceptions of the Police Through a Queer Theory and Procedural Justice Lens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
35 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Going beyond simplistic overgeneralization, this study analyses how diversity within the LGBTQ+ community is associated with differential perspectives on, and trust in, the police in Rotterdam. It utilizes queer theory concepts like heteronormativity and homonationalism to achieve a more complex and accurate understanding of LGBTQ+ perceptions and experiences and employs procedural justice theory to understand how these perceptions and experiences result in (dis)trust in the police. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 participants in Rotterdam. The results demonstrate that perceptions around the police are more negative, and less homogenous than quantitative surveys indicate—even in a country where tolerance of sexual minorities is relatively high. Differential acceptance of diversity in queerness under the LGBTQ+ umbrella seems to be crucial in shaping LGBTQ+ perceptions of the police, with “visibly queer” individuals being less accepted, and often holding more negative perceptions of the police. Future research should thus expand on how the various sub-groups within the LGBTQ+ spectrum perceive the police, and how trust can be improved, for example by strengthening the visibility of the PinkinBlue unit within the police.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1607-1632
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Homosexuality
Volume72
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 5 Aug 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Research programs

  • ESSB SOC

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can We Have Your ID Please? Understanding Differential LGBTQ+ Perceptions of the Police Through a Queer Theory and Procedural Justice Lens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this