Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
Economic evaluations predominantly use generic outcomes, such as EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), to assess the health status. However, because of the generic nature, they are less suitable to capture the quality of life of patients with specific conditions. Given the transition to patient-centered (remote) care delivery, this study aims to evaluate the possibility to use disease-specific measures in a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA).
METHODS:
A real-life cohort from Maasstad Hospital (2020-2021) in the Netherlands, with 772 Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients, was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of electronic consultations (e-consultations) compared with face-to-face consultations. The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) based on the generic EQ-5D was compared with ICER's based on RA specific measures; Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). To compare the cost-effectiveness of these different measures, HAQ-DI and RAID were expressed in QALYs via estimated conversion equations.
CONCLUSIONS:
The conventional ICER (e.g. EQ-5D) indicates that e-consultations are cost-effective with cost savings of - €161k per QALY gained for a prevalent RA cohort treated in a secondary trainee hospital. RA specific measures show similar results, with ICER's of - €163k per HAQ-DI(QALY) and - €223k per RAID(QALY) gained. RA specific measures capture patient-relevant domains and offer the opportunity to improve the assessment and treatment of the disease impact.
DISCUSSION:
Disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) offer a promising alternative for traditional measures in economic evaluations, capturing patient-relevant domains more comprehensively. As PROMs are increasingly applied in clinical practice, the next step entails modelling of a RA patient-wide conversion equation to implement PROMs in economic evaluations. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 191-199 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Arthritis Care & Research |
Volume | 76 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | Dec 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 The Authors. Arthritis Care & Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.