Career stage dependent effects of law firm governance: A multilevel study of professional-client misconduct

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Are governance practices employed by professional service firms equally effective in preventing professional-client misconduct for professionals at different stages of their career? Drawing upon professional-agency theory and the literature documenting professional career patterns, we develop a multilevel theoretical model to answer this question. We test our model in the empirical context of the Dutch legal profession, using firm-level survey data on 142 law firms and individual-level archival data from the 2994 lawyers working for these firms to explain 97 formally adjudicated complaints of professional-client misconduct committed by individual lawyers registered with the Amsterdam Bar Association. We find that the ‘orthodox’ distinction between informal behavioral and formal outcome-based governance practices is too course-grained to receive empirical support, and that firm-level governance practices only reduce professional-client misconduct when they are specifically targeted at the career stage of the lawyers employed. Our findings not only allow us to develop a finer-grained version of Sharma’s professional-agency model, but may also be practically useful in developing firm-level governance practices targeted at different strata of professionals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1497-1529
Number of pages33
JournalHuman Relations
Volume72
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Career stage dependent effects of law firm governance: A multilevel study of professional-client misconduct'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this