Causes and consequences of assurance provider choice for sustainability reporting: an international study

Paolo Perego

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

An increasing number of companies voluntary disclose information about their social and environment performance in sustainability reports. This study investigates the causes and consequences of choosing different assurance providers for companies seeking independent verification of their sustainability reports. We employ a logistical regression analysis from an international sample of 136 companies to document that companies domiciled in countries with a weaker governance system are more likely to choose a big-4 accounting firm as assurance provider. We additionally examine the association between the type of assurance provider and the quality of a sustainability assurance statement. Using a content analysis based on an existing framework (O'Dwyer and Owen, 2005), we provide evidence that big-4 accounting firms positively affect assurance quality in terms of reporting format and assurance procedures. In contrast, the quality of the recommendations and opinions in a sustainability assurance statement is positively associated with non-accounting assurance providers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)412-425
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Management
Volume26
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Cite this