Challenges relating to solid tumour brain metastases in clinical trials, part 1: patient population, response, and progression. A report from the RANO group

NU Lin, EQ Lee, H Aoyama, IJ Barani, BG Baumert, PD Brown, DR Camidge, SM Chang, J Dancey, LE Gaspar, GJ Harris, FS Hodi, SN Kalkanis, KR Lamborn, ME Linskey, DR Macdonald, K Margolin, MP Mehta, D Schiff, R SoffiettiJH Suh, Martin van den Bent, MA Vogelbaum, JS Wefel, PY Wen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

98 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Therapeutic outcomes for patients with brain metastases need to improve. A critical review of trials specifically addressing brain metastases shows key issues that could prevent acceptance of results by regulatory agencies, including enrolment of heterogeneous groups of patients and varying definitions of clinical endpoints. Considerations specific to disease, modality, and treatment are not consistently addressed. Additionally, the schedule of CNS imaging and consequences of detection of new or progressive brain metastases in trials mainly exploring the extra-CNS activity of systemic drugs are highly variable. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group is an independent, international, collaborative effort to improve the design of trials in patients with brain tumours. In this two-part series, we review the state of clinical trials of brain metastases and suggest a consensus recommendation for the development of criteria for future clinical trials.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)E396-E406
JournalLancet Oncology
Volume14
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Cite this