Choi response criteria for early prediction of clinical outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer treated with sunitinib

A A M van der Veldt, M R Meijerink, A J M van den Eertwegh, J B A G Haanen, E Boven

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

146 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because sunitinib can induce extensive necrosis in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC), we examined whether criteria defined by Choi might be valuable to predict early sunitinib efficacy.

METHODS: Computed tomography was used for measurement of tumour lesions in mm and lesion attenuation in Hounsfield units (HUs). According to Choi criteria partial response (PR) was defined as > or =10% decrease in size or > or =15% decrease in attenuation.

RESULTS: A total of 55 mRCC patients treated with sunitinib were included. At first evaluation, according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 7 patients had PR, 38 stable disease (SD), and 10 progressive disease (PD), whereas according to Choi criteria 36 patients had PR, 6 SD and 13 PD. Median tumour attenuation decreased from 66 to 47 HUs (P< or =0.001). In patients with PR, Choi criteria had a significantly better predictive value for progression-free survival and overall survival (both Ps<0.001) than RECIST (P=0.685 and 0.191 respectively). The predictive value for RECIST increased (P=0.001 and <0.001 respectively), when best response during treatment was taken into account.

CONCLUSION: Choi criteria could be helpful to define early mRCC patients who benefit from sunitinib, but the use of these criteria will not change the management of these patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)803-9
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume102
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Mar 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Choi response criteria for early prediction of clinical outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer treated with sunitinib'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this