Clinical decision support system to optimise symptom management in palliative medicine: Focus group study

Lotte Van Der Stap*, Albert H. De Heij, Agnes Van Der Heide, Anna K.L. Reyners, Yvette M. Van Der Linden

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Suboptimal symptom control in patients with life-limiting illnesses is a major issue. A clinical decision support system (CDSS) that combines a patient-reported symptom assessment scale (SAS) and guideline-based individualised recommendations has the potential to improve symptom management. However, lacking end-user acceptance often prevents CDSS use in daily practice. We aimed to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of a palliative care CDSS according to its targeted end-users. Methods: Six focus groups with different groups of stakeholders were conducted: (1) patient representatives; (2) community nurses; (3) hospital nurses; (4) general practitioners; (5) hospital physicians and (6) palliative care specialists. Audiotapes were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. Results: Fifty-one stakeholders (6-12 per focus group) participated. Six themes were discussed: effect, validity, continuity, practical usability, implementation and additional features. All participants expected a CDSS to improve symptom management, for example, by reminding clinicians of blind spots and prompting patient participation. They feared interference with professional autonomy of physicians, doubted the validity of using a patient-reported SAS as CDSS input and thought lacking care continuity would complicate CDSS use. Clinicians needed clear criteria for when to use the CDSS (eg, life-limiting illness, timing in illness trajectory). Participants preferred a patient-coordinated system but were simultaneously concerned patients may be unwilling or unable to fill out an SAS. Conclusions: A palliative care CDSS was considered useful for improving symptom management. To develop a feasible system, barriers for successful implementation must be addressed including concerns about using a patient-reported SAS, lacking care continuity and unclear indications for use.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E397-E407
JournalBMJ Supportive and Palliative Care
Volume13
Issue numbere2
Early online date16 Jul 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jul 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical decision support system to optimise symptom management in palliative medicine: Focus group study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this