Clinical events classification (CEC) in clinical trials: Report on the current landscape and future directions — proceedings from the CEC Summit 2018

Abhinav Sharma, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Charles Michael Gibson, Karen A. Hicks, Karen P. Alexander, Maria Ali, Bernard R. Chaitman, Claes Held, Mark Hlatky, WIlliam Schuyler Jones, Roxana Mehran, Venu Menon, Frank W. Rockhold, Jonathan Seltzer, Ernest Spitzer, Matthew Wilson, Renato D. Lopes*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Importance: Clinical events adjudication is pivotal for generating consistent and comparable evidence in clinical trials. The methodology of event adjudication is evolving, but research is needed to develop best practices and spur innovation. Observations: A meeting of stakeholders from regulatory agencies, academic and contract research organizations, pharmaceutical and device companies, and clinical trialists convened in Chicago, IL, for Clinical Events Classification (CEC) Summit 2018 to discuss key topics and future directions. Formal studies are lacking on strategies to optimize CEC conduct, improve efficiency, minimize cost, and generally increase the speed and accuracy of the event adjudication process. Major challenges to CEC discussed included ensuring rigorous quality of the process, identifying safety events, standardizing event definitions, using uniform strategies for missing information, facilitating interactions between CEC members and other trial leadership, and determining the CEC's role in pragmatic trials or trials using real-world data. Consensus recommendations from the meeting include the following: (1) ensure an adequate adjudication infrastructure; (2) use negatively adjudicated events to identify important safety events reported only outside the scope of the primary endpoint; (3) conduct further research in the use of artificial intelligence and digital/mobile technologies to streamline adjudication processes; and (4) emphasize the importance of standardizing event definitions and quality metrics of CEC programs. Conclusions and Relevance: As novel strategies for clinical trials emerge to generate evidence for regulatory approval and to guide clinical practice, a greater understanding of the role of the CEC process will be critical to optimize trial conduct and increase confidence in the data generated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93-104
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
Volume246
Early online date29 Jan 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical events classification (CEC) in clinical trials: Report on the current landscape and future directions — proceedings from the CEC Summit 2018'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this